Radiologia Brasileira - Publicação Científica Oficial do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia

INTRODUCTION

Childhood obesity is considered a public health problem worldwide⁽¹⁾, being the most common cause of insulin resistance, as well as provoking other metabolic alterations^(2,3). In this context, the accumulation of fat in the abdomen and central distribution of that fat have been described as major risk factors for metabolic alterations and cardiovascular diseases^(4,5). Various imaging methods have been used in the evaluation of the distribution of abdominal fat^(6-11), such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, the last being the most rapid method, being easily accepted, and not employing ionizing radiation, which is of great importance, especially in childhood⁽¹²⁾.

The purpose of this study was to use ultrasound as a method to evaluate the distribution of abdominal fat components and to correlate that distribution with the main metabolic alterations in obese prepubertal children.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted at the Pedro Ernesto University Hospital of the State University of Rio de Janeiro, including 77 children identified as being prepubertal according to the Tanner stage and classified as obese because they all had a body mass index at or above the 97th percentile⁽¹³⁾. The study group comprised 33 girls and 44 boys, with a mean age of 7.31 years (range, 5-11 years); none of the children had any associated diseases, and none had previously undergone a therapeutic intervention for weight loss. As a control group, we also included 31 prepubertal normal-weight children (17 girls and 14 boys) with a mean age of 7.32 years.

Ultrasound was performed by two physicians, each with more than 10 years of experience, in a double-blind manner. The subject was placed in the supine position, the transducer was situated approximately 2 cm above the umbilicus, and all measurements were taken in the axial plane, without any pressure of the transducer on the abdomen. The abdominal wall thickness (AWT) was defined as the distance between the skin and the anterior aspect of the linea alba (Figure 1). The abdominal fat thickness (AFT) was defined as the distance between the posterior aspect of the linea alba and the anterior wall of the aorta (Figure 2). We used an Aplio XG ultrasound device (SSA-790A; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) with a 3.5 MHz convex transducer for AFT measurement and a 12 MHz linear transducer for AWT measurement. No preparation was required prior to the examination. The mean examination time was less than 10 min, and the procedure was well tolerated by all of the patients.




In order to evaluate the metabolic alterations, we calculated fasting serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, glucose, and insulin, as well as the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, which was determined by multiplying the value obtained for glucose (mmol/L) by that obtained for insulin (µIU/mL) and dividing the result by 22.5. The HOMA-IR cut-off point for normality was defined as 2.5⁽¹⁴⁾.

The data were stored in Excel for Windows version 8.0 (Microsoft Corp.) and analyzed by the R programming language, versions 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The continuous variables studied were HDL, triglycerides, fasting glycemia, AFT (in mm), and AWT (in mm). The categorical variables were gender, HOMA-IR status, HDL status, hypertriglyceridemia status, and glucose intolerance status.

Continuous variables were expressed as median ± standard deviation. The Wilcoxon test was used in order to compare the medians, and the chi-square test was used in order to evaluate possible AFT and AWT cut-off points that showed the strongest associations with the metabolic alterations evaluated. Multivariate linear regression models were adjusted for the parameters AFT and AWT, which were considered dependent variables. The independent variables included in the initial model were fasting glycemia, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, age, and gender. In all statistical tests, a level of confidence of 95% (p ≤ 0.05) was adopted.


RESULTS

In the obese prepubertal children evaluated, the median AFT was 41.40 ± 11.51 mm and the median AWT was 19.80 ± 6.74 mm, compared with 24.40 ± 8.36 mm and 5.80 ±2.12 mm, respectively, in the control (normal-weight) group. We identified no differences related to gender in either group.

Regarding the metabolic alterations, 23 children had an altered HOMA-IR index, 50 had a decreased HDL level, four had glucose intolerance, and 13 had hypertriglyceridemia. Twenty-two children presented with two or more of those alterations.

The median AFT and AWT values were compared between the groups with and without the metabolic alterations, which were analyzed individually (Table 1). On the basis of that analysis, we found that AFT and AWT both correlated significantly with an altered HOMA-IR index (p < 0.031 and p < 0.001, respectively); only AWT correlated significantly with hypertriglyceridemia (p < 0.038).




In the multivariate linear regression models used for the AFT and AWT parameters, the independent variables were fasting glycemia, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, age, and gender. In that model, there was no correlation between hypertriglyceridemia and AWT. We found that the HOMA-IR index correlated directly with AFT and AWT. For each unit increase in the HOMA-IR index, there was an increase of 1.313 mm in the AFT (p < 0.0262) and an increase of 1.021 mm in the AWT (p < 0.0027), as shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. However, the correlation between the AWT and the HOMA-IR index retained its statistical significance after the insertion of the variables gender and age into the model (Table 3), whereas that between the AFT and the HOMA-IR index did not (Table 2).




DISCUSSION

Although childhood obesity is considered a global epidemic, there have been few studies correlating serum metabolic alterations with measurements of abdominal fat distribution by imaging methods, especially in prepubertal children. In this age group, there is still no action of sexual steroids that may interfere with metabolic evaluation^(15,16). In the present study, we used ultrasound as a method to evaluate abdominal fat distribution in correlation with fasting glycemia, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and the HOMA-IR index in 77 obese prepubertal children, showing that only the HOMA-IR index correlated significantly with AFT and AWT, notably with the latter.

Regarding the lipid metabolism, Semiz et al.⁽¹⁷⁾ also found no relationship with AFT, whereas other authors have identified a positive correlation between AFT and hypertriglyceridemia^(18,19). In addition, Jung et al.⁽¹⁹⁾ found a negative correlation between AFT and HDL cholesterol. However, in all of those studies^(17-19), the study sample included prepubertal and pubertal children who were older than those evaluated in our study, which could have influenced the findings, given that the literature shows that alterations in lipid metabolism can be influenced by the degree of sexual maturity⁽²⁰⁾; that is, by the influence of sex hormones at the different stages of sexual maturation. None of the studies cited evaluated the AWT^(17-19,20).

Various studies have evaluated fasting glycemia in correlation with the distribution of abdominal fat^(17,21). None of those studies have demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the two, which is in keeping with our findings.

The HOMA-IR index reflects insulin resistance⁽²²⁾. Therefore, it is a relevant marker of altered metabolism, as has been described in various studies^(17-19,21), notably those conducted by Reinehr et al.⁽¹⁸⁾ and Reyes et al.⁽²¹⁾, who also identified a correlation between AFT and the HOMA-IR index.

It was not possible to correlate our findings in relation to AWT with those of some previous studies^(18,19,21), in which AWT was not measured.

In agreement with our findings, Semiz et al.⁽¹⁷⁾, demonstrated that AWT correlated significantly with metabolic risk factors but found no such correlation for AFT. Those authors evaluated 33 children with mean age of 12 ± 2.7 years, although they did not distinguish between pubertal and prepubertal children, which might have been the specific cause of their findings being similar to ours, due to a possible predominance of the prepubertal group over the pubertal group. In general, in the distribution of adiposity in children, regardless of gender, a predominance of the subcutaneous component has been observed⁽²³⁾, as it was in our obese prepubertal group. In obese children, that predominance seems to correlate positively with an alteration in the HOMA-IR index, suggesting some kind of effect on the development of insulin resistance, which is different from what is described for the adult population⁽¹⁷⁾. Therefore, the fact that most of the children in our sample showed a predominance of accumulation of fat in the abdominal wall indicates that it could be a factor related to insulin resistance. There is a need for further studies, considering puberty separately from chronological age, so that correlations can be established between the metabolic changes related to childhood obesity and the distribution of abdominal fat.


CONCLUSION

In obese prepubertal children, the AWT, as measured by ultrasound, appears to have a stronger relationship with the HOMA-IR index, a determinant of insulin resistance, than with the lipid metabolism or glycemia.


REFERENCES

1. Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Church TS, et al. The epidemiological transition and the global childhood obesity epidemic. Int J Obes Suppl. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S3-8.

2. Serrano Jr CV, Gomes FLT, Torres TCA, et al. Obesidade e doença cardiovascular tromboembólica. In: Mancini MC, coordenador. Tratado de obesidade. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Guanabara Koogan; 2015. p. 290-5.

3. Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity-the shape of things to come. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2325-7.

4. Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Sprecher DL, et al. Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. Circulation. 1999;99:541-5.

5. Owens S, Gutin B, Ferguson M, et al. Visceral adipose tissue and cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. J Pediatr. 1998;133:41-5.

6. Mook-Kanamori DO, Holzhauer S, Hollestein LM, et al. Abdominal fat in children measured by ultrasound and computed tomography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1938-46.

7. Image Gently [internet]. Radiation. [cited 2016 June 10]. Available from: http://www.imagegently.org.

8. Semiz S, Ozgören E, Sabir N. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31:53-8.

9. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17:209-14.

10. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004;5 Suppl 1:4-104.

11. Sabir N, Pakdemirli E, Sermez Y, et al. Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;31:26-30.

12. Sakuno T, Tomita LM, Tomita CM, et al. Sonographic evaluation of visceral and subcutaneous fat in obese children. Radiol Bras. 2014;47:149-53.

13. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, et al. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660-7.

14. Madeira IR, Carvalho CNN, Gazolla FM, et al. Ponto de corte do índice homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA- IR) avaliado pela curva receiver operating characteristic (ROC) na detecção de síndrome metabólica em crianças pré-púberes com excesso de peso. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2008;52:1466-73.

15. Aycan Z, Berberoglu M, Ocal G, et al. Relationship between plasma leptin, insulin and tumor necrosis factor alpha in obese children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18:275-84.

16. Druet C, Dabbas M, Baltakse V, et al. Insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome in obese French children. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;64:672-8.

17. Semiz S, Ozgoren E, Sabir N, et al. Body fat distribution in childhood obesity: association with metabolic risk factors. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;45:457-62.

18. Reinehr T, Wunsch R. Relationships between cardiovascular risk profile, ultrasonographic measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue, and waist circumference in obese children. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:24-30.

19. Jung JH, Jung MK, Kim KE, et al. Ultrasound measurement of pediatric visceral fat thickness: correlations with metabolic and liver profiles. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;21:75-80.

20. Bertrais S, Balkau B, Charles MA, et al. Puberty-associated differences in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels according to sex in French children aged 10-13 years. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10:316-23.

21. Reyes M, Espinoza A, Rebollo MJ, et al. Ultrasound measurements of intra-abdominal adiposity and factors associated with cardiovascular risk in obese children. Rev Med Chil. 2010;138:152-9.

22. Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT, et al. Total and intraabdominal fat distribution in preadolescents and adolescents: measurement with MR imaging. Radiology. 2007;242:846-56.

23. Slyper AH. Childhood obesity, adipose tissue distribution, and the pediatric practitioner. Pediatrics. 1998;102:e4.










1. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2. Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (HUPE-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Correspondence:
Dra. Arine Santos Peçanha
Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro. Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 20550-900
E-mail: arinep@yahoo.com.br

Recebido para publicação em 21/December/2016
Aceito, após revisão, em 22/September/2017

Study conducted at the Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (HUPE-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil